(March 2022)
This endorsement modifies the replacement cost provision
found in the HO 00 02, HO 00 03 or HO 00 05. It requires that dwelling coverage
be written at a specified percentage of the insured dwelling’s replacement
cost. Instead of carrying coverage at the standard 80%, Coverage A may be
written at 70%, 60% or even 50% of the home’s total replacement cost and still
qualify for settling losses on a replacement cost basis. The use of the
endorsement is subject to rules and company underwriting with regard to minimum
dwelling coverage limits.
Maintaining high limits of insurance to comply with
insurance-to-value requirements as residence values continuously rise can be
problematic. This is especially true in certain instances, such as when:
·
the replacement cost bears little relationship
to market value
·
an insured is financially constrained (and NO
leinholder exists)
·
an insured has a strong aversion to maintaining
full insurance to value limits
In these cases, the HO 04 56 form may be an option.
The HO 04 56–Special Loss Settlement form permits an insured
to cover his home at 70, 60 or even as low as 50% of an applicable insured
home’s replacement cost and still remain eligible for replacement cost
adjustment on partial, note partial losses. Replacement cost settlement applies
to residence and other structure losses if, at the time of the loss, the amount
of coverage carried on the property exceeds the specified percentage to
replacement cost requirement that appears on this form’s schedule. If it is
less than what was required, settlement is made on an ACV basis.
The form’s Loss Settlement condition replaces the provision
of the policy it modifies. Any calculation of a loss settlement does not include
the financial impact from the enforcement of any ordinance or law applying to
construction, renovation, demolition, etc., except for what may be provided
under the base policy’s Ordinance or Law Additional Coverage.
Of course, both the agent and the insurer must be very
careful in agreeing to provide this coverage since other options may be more
prudent. This is especially the case when other financial interests are
involved, such as mortgagees. Errors and Omissions could also be a problem if a
significant loss occurs and an insured becomes unhappy with their loss
settlement.
Example: The
Smiths have had their luxury home insured with Upskale Casualty since 2012.
At the time, they added the HO 04 56 and wrote the home with a Coverage A
limit of $314,000, which represented 70% of its replacement cost. In 2022,
the home was struck by lightning and the resulting fire destroyed the home.
The Smiths, claiming that they forgot about the HO 04 56, sue their agent and
Upskale because the home’s current replacement cost exceeds $500,000. |
|
Certain property, such as structural support elements and
subsurface structures are excluded when calculating the applicable replacement
cost figure.
Personal property, including outdoor antennas, non-building
structures, equipment, grave markers, and mausoleums are adjusted according to
actual cash value.
Under Coverages A or B, when a loss occurs that exceeds the and
amount that is less than $5,000 (up from $2,500. 03 22 Change) and less
than 5% of the applicable amount of insurance, payment is based on ACV,
initially. When the actual repair or replacement of the damaged or destroyed
property is completed, the loss qualifies for settlement on a replacement cost
basis. However, any payment is still constrained by the applicable limit
appearing on the form, the actual cost to make a replacement or repair and the
use of material of like kind, quality, or function. The form is only obligated
to respond to a loss according to the least expensive option. Therefore, while
the form permits more flexibility in writing more complicated coverage
situations, the property owner, ultimately, bears a much larger share of risk.
The form includes a number of, essentially, editorial
revisions to align with the latest edition of the ISO HO Program. (03 22
Change)